Document Control Procedure
(QMS-ISPL-P-DCP)
|
Version No |
V20 |
Prepared by |
|
|
Date |
30-01-2015 |
Name |
Suman |
|
Signature |
|
||
|
Date |
30-01-2015 |
||
|
Copy No |
|
Approved by |
|
|
Issued to |
|
Name |
Sai Prasad Koneru |
|
Signature |
|
||
|
Date |
30-01-2015 |
||
Document Amendment Record
A- A- Added, M- Modified, D- Deleted
|
Sl.No |
Date |
Version No |
Page No |
Change Mode(A/M/D) |
Brief description of change |
|
1 |
|
V01 |
N/A |
A |
Initial Release |
|
2 |
|
V02 |
6 |
M |
Updated complete section 7.3
Documents review and approval |
|
7 |
M |
Updated complete section 7.4.2
Documents Change control |
|||
|
7 |
M |
Included "Feedback Tracker"
reference in section 9 Records |
|||
|
3 |
06-06-2012 |
V02 |
N/A |
D |
The Company address information is
removed from the Footer |
|
4 |
30-01-2015 |
V20 |
N/A |
N/A |
Reviewed and base lined |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 Entry criteria,
Input, Activity, Output, Exit criteria
6 Responsibility
for preparation
7.2 Document
version and revision
7.3 Document
review and approval
7.4 Document
control and issue
1 Purpose
The purpose of this procedure is
to establish and maintain a documented procedure to control the documents
related to the quality management system of Inooga
Solutions and to ensure that all the controlled documents are properly managed.
2 Objective
All documents utilized within the quality management system
of Inooga Solutions and related to software
development life cycle are controlled to ensure that they are issued to the
appropriate personnel, under the correct level of authority, are revised and
re-issued as necessary and all obsolete documents are removed from the point of
use.
3 Scope
Document control procedure is
applicable to all controlled documents under quality management system.
4 Terms and definitions
|
Abbreviations/Terms |
Description |
|
QMS |
Quality
Management System |
|
ISPL |
Inooga
Solutions Private Limited. |
|
PIN |
Project
Initiation Note |
|
CEO |
Chief
Executive Officer |
|
CTO |
Chief
Technology Officer |
|
Master Copy |
A document marked as ‘Master copy’ is kept in a
document library for safe custody. Copies of master copy are made for issue. |
|
Controlled Copy |
A
document marked ‘Controlled copy’ and issued to users. A controlled copy needs to be revised or reissued
whenever changes are incorporated. |
|
Baseline |
A
formally approved version of a configuration item, regardless of media,
formally designated and fixed at a specific time during the configuration
items life cycle. |
5 Entry criteria, Input, Activity, Output, Exit criteria
|
Sl.No. |
Entry criteria |
Input |
Activity |
Output |
Exit criteria |
|
1 |
Need
for preparation of documents |
Information
for preparation of documents Templates/formats |
Document
preparation, review and approval |
Approved
documents review
records |
Need
for documents fulfilled |
|
2 |
Documents
required by the users |
Approved
documents |
Document
issue and control |
Document
Issue records document
master index |
Documents
received by the users |
6 Responsibility for preparation
|
Activity |
Responsibility for preparation |
Review & Approval
Authority |
Issuing Authority |
|
Quality Manual |
Management
Representative (MR) |
CEO/CTO |
MR |
|
Quality System Procedures |
QA
Manager |
CEO/CTO |
MR |
|
Processes, Guidelines and
Templates |
Head
of respective departments |
CTO/CEO |
MR |
|
Documents generated during
Software Development Life Cycles |
Project
leader or project manager |
Project
manager / Head of the projects/CTO |
MR |
7 Procedure description
7.1 Document preparation
Management Representative (MR)
prepares quality manual, quality management system procedures,
managers of respective departments prepare process manuals, templates, and
quality records formats etc.
Project leader or project
manager prepares all project related documents as part of software development
life cycle. Some of these documents are software requirements specification,
design documents, project management plan, and software test plan.
Every document is identified
uniquely. Following methods are adopted for document identification.
|
Sl.No |
Document
Description |
Document
type |
|
1. |
Quality Manual |
QML |
|
2. |
Process Manual |
M |
|
3. |
Procedure |
P |
|
4. |
Template |
T |
|
5. |
Form |
F |
|
6. |
Record/Report |
R |
|
7. |
Log |
L |
|
8. |
Checklist |
C |
|
9. |
Guidelines |
G |
Quality management system documents are identified as document
type followed by document acronym. Document acronym is of three letters. For
example document control procedure is identified as “QMS-ISPL-P-DCP”.
Where,
QMS
-
Quality Management System (QMS)
ISPL
-
Inooga Solutions Private Limited.
P
-
Procedure
DCP
-
Document control procedure
The coding structure for manuals is: QMS–ISPL-M-XXX
Where M – Process manual, XXX
– Document name
The coding structure for procedures is: QMS-ISPL–P-XXX
Where P – Procedure, XXX – Document name
Note
: if there are more than one document with similar
acronym, then - X may added to differentiate one document from another
document.
Eg: SDM-O
The form/log/report/record/Guidelines coding structure is:
QMS-ISPL-F/L/R/G-XXX
Where F – Form, L – Log, R – Report/Record, G -
Guidelines, XXX – Document name.
The project Id will consist of 9
characters: AXA2002-1
Where the first 3 (AXA) characters describe the name of the
client in short
Next 4 (2002)numbers describe the
year in which the project started followed by "-"(hyphen)
and the last number(1)
indicates the no. of project for that particular client in the year mentioned
During the project initiation, the project documentation is
prepared by the respective project managers of the project by creating a
project directory in either of the following two methods
Method I or
Method II:
Method I :
Project
directory structure:
PRD – project root directory
(project code).
PRD\PROJECT_PLANNING – PMP_1.0, PMP_1.1, records etc.
PRD\REQUIREMENTS – SRS_1.0, review records etc.
PRD\DESIGN – HLD, DDD, test cases etc.
PRD\CODING – bug reports etc.
PRD\TESTING – STP etc.
PRD\INSTALLATION – Project Sign-off, manual etc.
PRD\ACCEPTANCE – Acceptance test report etc.
PRD\CLIENT – Mails, customer feedback etc.
PRD\MARKETING – Proposal, contracts, etc.
PRD\SQA – SQA_1.0.
PRD\DOCUMENTATION – User manual, etc.
PRD\MISCELLANEOUS.
Method II :
Project
directory structure:
|
Sl.No. |
Root
Directory |
Sl.No. |
Folder Name
|
Sub Folder
Name |
||||
|
1. 1. |
ZZZYYYY-N Where
:- {ZZZ} is acronym for {Project id} For Example :-[AXA] {YYYY} is acronym for {Year} For Example :-[2002] {N} is acronym for {Unique
id} For Example :-[1] Hence the {project root directory}
naming convention would be as follows :- For Example :- [AXA2002-1] |
1.1 |
ADMIN |
|
||||
|
1.2 |
AUDIT REPORTS |
|||||||
|
1.3 |
CHANGE REQUEST |
|||||||
|
1.4 |
CUSTOMER FEEDBACK |
|||||||
|
1.5 |
MEETINGS |
1.5.1 |
PROJECT REVIEW MEETINGS |
|||||
|
1.5.2 |
TEAM REVIEW MEETINGS |
|||||||
|
1.6 |
MISC |
|
||||||
|
1.7 |
PROJECT DOCUMENTS |
1.7.1 |
CUSTOMER DOCUMENTS |
|||||
|
1.7.2 |
PMP |
|||||||
|
1.7.3 |
REQUIREMENTS_DESIGN |
1.7.3.1 |
TEST PLAN |
|||||
|
1.8 |
REVIEW DEFECT REPORTS |
|
||||||
|
1.9 |
SOURCE CODE |
|||||||
|
1.10 |
SOURCE CODE -REL |
|||||||
|
1.11 |
STATUS REPORTS |
|||||||
|
1.12 |
TEST DEFECT REPORTS |
1.12.1 |
NOTIFICATION |
|||||
|
1.12.2 |
SDFs |
|||||||
|
1.12.3 |
SUBSEQUENT CALL |
|||||||
|
1.13 |
TIMESHEETS |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.2 Document version and revision
7.2.1 Manual control of documents
Each document has a version number associated
with it in the format "VNN", where “V” indicates
version and “NN” is a double digit version number. Once the
document is ready for release, it is baselined by
allocating version number 01. “NN” - is the running version
number, once the document is baselined, the approving
authority approves the document.
7.2.2 Control of documents using
tool
When a tool
is used for controlling the documents, the standards allowed by the tool, are
followed for the version control of the documents.
7.3 Document review and approval
Quality management system documents and project documents
are reviewed and approved by the approving authority. Record of document review
and approval is maintained in the following manner:
· As per document
review record (QMS-ISPL-F-DRR) or
· In the review
record (QMS-ISPL-R-REV) or
· In the
workhorse tool under review record
Review and approvals done through emails are recorded in the
email folder and are shown as evidence when required. Separate review records
like document review record or review records, need not be maintained for the
documents, which are approved through emails (apart from the record maintained
in the mail folder).
7.4 Document control and issue
All the documents used by the
project/department are documented in the document master list. This list is
prepared by the projects / functions initially during the initiation phase and
is updated on the issue of each document or its revised version. In project
teams/functions where documents are maintained using a configuration management
tool, the document master list need not be maintained.
When documents are planned to be
distributed among the project or across the projects, the same are documented
using the document distribution list form from QMS. When soft copies of the
documents are distributed, the mail used for distributing the documents can be
accepted as evidence of document distribution. All such mails are segregated
and placed in a specific folder for easy retrieval.
If the hard copy of the document is
the master copy, the document is identified by stamping "MASTER COPY"
on the title page of the document. When the hard copies of the document are
distributed, each hard copy is identified by stamping "CONTROLLED
COPY" in red with the copy number on the title page of the document.
7.4.1 Electronic version of QMS
documents
Quality management system documentation
is stored and maintained on a local server for easy access and reference. All
the employees have reader access, where as MR and his
department have editor access (i.e. read, write, delete access) to this
database. All the changes to the manuals are implemented simultaneously in the
electronic version along with hard copy manuals.
Project documentation is
preferably stored in a configuration management tool like visual source safe
(VSS) database or any other relevant tool.
For each project, the project leader/project manager creates a directory
by the project name, in the VSS database or any other relevant tool.
7.4.2 Document change control
All requests for change to QMS
documents can be reported by email or in writing to the MR by means of document
change requests using the Document Change Request Form(QMS-ISPL-F-DCH).
MR or a approving authority analyzes the feedback
based on the document change request or the QMS feedback tracker and identifies
the impact of the feedback given. If the feedback warrants changes to the QMS
documents, the approval authority for the respective documents reviews and
approves the changes. Once the documents are baselined,
they are released in the next version of QMS.
8 Quality system documents referred
Nil
9 Records
|
Sl. No. |
Required Record |
Custodian |
Retention Period |
Record ID |
|
|
MR |
1 year |
||
|
|
MR |
1 year |
||
|
|
MR |
1 year |
||
|
|
MR |
1 year |
||
|
|
MR |
1 year |
||
|
|
QMS Release- Feedback Tracker |
MR |
1 year |